The Answer Is More Straightforward Than You Think: Finance AI—Build vs. Buy?

By Tara Parker

July 18, 2024

When it comes to implementing generative AI applications in the finance sector, the debate between building in-house solutions versus purchasing from vendors can seem complex. However, the decision often leans convincingly towards buying. Here’s why this choice is not only pragmatic but essential for most businesses looking to harness the power of AI in finance.

The Challenge of Building Generative AI in Finance

 

  1. Developing Cognitive Architectures: Building a generative AI application involves more than just setting up large language models (LLMs). The real challenge lies in developing a cognitive architecture that understands and processes complex financial data and interactions. Unlike straightforward data tasks, financial AI must perform under the stringent demands of accuracy, compliance, and context-awareness.
  2. Rigorous Testing: Testing an AI system in finance goes beyond typical software application testing. Financial environments are dynamic, with continuous fluctuations in data and regulatory requirements. Ensuring that an AI system is robust and reliable under these conditions is not just challenging—it can border on being unfeasible for many in-house IT teams.
  3. Maintenance Overheads: Once live, the AI system requires continuous updates and maintenance to stay relevant as financial conditions, regulations, and technologies evolve. This ongoing effort demands a dedicated team with specialized knowledge, which can be prohibitively expensive and resource-intensive.

The Practicality of Buying

 

  1. Rapid Deployment and Immediate Benefits: When buying an AI solution, companies benefit from the vendor’s experience and refined product. For example, consider a scenario where a financial institution decided to build its own AI platform. The projected timeline was two years just to get off the ground. In contrast, purchasing a ready-made solution could have this technology operational in a matter of months, translating to quicker realization of benefits such as enhanced decision-making, improved customer service, and operational efficiencies.
  2. Vendor Support and Best Practices: Vendors not only provide the technology but also bring a wealth of experience from other implementations. They offer testing support, updates, and maintenance, ensuring the AI application performs optimally without the heavy lifting from the customer’s side. Sharing best practices and lessons learned from across the industry can dramatically streamline the integration and utilization of the AI system.
  3. Focus on Core Business: By opting to buy, companies can focus on their core financial services while leveraging cutting-edge technology. This approach minimizes distraction from the primary business objectives, providing space to innovate in service delivery rather than technology management.

Security and Privacy Considerations


While buying may be the best approach for integrating AI into financial operations, it is crucial to not gloss over the security and privacy concerns. Financial data is sensitive, and its handling must comply with both local and international data protection regulations.

When selecting a vendor, ensure that their solutions meet the highest standards of security and that they provide adequate measures to protect data integrity and confidentiality. Evaluate their compliance certifications, security infrastructure, and data handling policies thoroughly before making a commitment.


Humanizing the Decision


Choosing between building or buying an AI solution should not just be a technical decision but a human-centered one. The goal is to enhance your team’s capabilities, not to burden them with unmanageable technology or to sideline them in critical decision-making processes. The decision should empower employees, align with organizational culture, and enhance customer satisfaction.


Ultimately, for most businesses in the financial sector, buying a generative AI application is not only the more straightforward choice but also the most strategic one. It allows companies to stay at the forefront of technology innovation while ensuring they remain focused on their core mission—serving their customers and leading in the marketplace.